arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational19 October 2026
Advertising to Agents: Measuring Description-Framing Bias in LLM Tool Selection
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2605.23916v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: AI agents often pick tools from registries, where each provider writes its tool's description; we ask whether sales language there changes which tool an agent picks. We built pairs of listings that differ in one way (praise, a verifiable specification, or list order) and asked two OpenAI models to call one tool. In a preregistered study, stacked praise (four kinds) raised a tool's pick rate by about 43 percentage points, matching or beating a verifiable specification. Praise also pulled some picks toward tools whose numeric limit was to
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- Structured Authority Injection: Persistent Human Control for LLM Agents via Typed MCP Overrides19 October 2026
- Rethinking User Encoders: Routing Diffusion States for Scenario-Adaptive User Representation19 October 2026
- From Events to Reasoning: Hierarchical Rule Composition over Explicit States19 October 2026
- ECHOES: Seeing Beyond the Current Image via Recursive History Compression and Privileged On-Policy Distillation19 October 2026
- Sensitivity Analysis of Decision Rules in an Agent-Based Agro-Ecological Model19 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.