arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational19 October 2026
Algorithmic Primitives of Theory of Mind Benchmarks
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2604.17819v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Do Theory of Mind (ToM) benchmarks really test theory of mind, or are they actually testing parsing and algorithmic state tracking? While benchmarks vary modality and dialogue length, this paper finds that they re-encode the same few state transition algorithms. We create PDDL-Mind, a neuro-symbolic approach that recovers such algorithms and upstream inductive biases of ToM benchmarks explicitly by parsing narratives into the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) and executes candidate actions against a predefined set of update alg
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- Structured Authority Injection: Persistent Human Control for LLM Agents via Typed MCP Overrides19 October 2026
- Rethinking User Encoders: Routing Diffusion States for Scenario-Adaptive User Representation19 October 2026
- From Events to Reasoning: Hierarchical Rule Composition over Explicit States19 October 2026
- ECHOES: Seeing Beyond the Current Image via Recursive History Compression and Privileged On-Policy Distillation19 October 2026
- Sensitivity Analysis of Decision Rules in an Agent-Based Agro-Ecological Model19 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.