arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational19 October 2026
Between Spoilers and Guesswork: Avoiding Over-Specification in Coding Benchmarks
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2610.22760v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Benchmarks drive AI progress, but are hampered by task under-specification and over-specification. Task under-specification causes guesswork, where solutions have to make things up, or worse, resort to contamination or reward hacking. Task over-specification causes spoilers, where solutions can bypass some of the harder steps the benchmark was supposed to measure. Since future-looking benchmarks should be difficult, over-specification reduces a benchmark's shelflife of community adoption. Repository-level coding benchmarks have helped the field p
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- Structured Authority Injection: Persistent Human Control for LLM Agents via Typed MCP Overrides19 October 2026
- Rethinking User Encoders: Routing Diffusion States for Scenario-Adaptive User Representation19 October 2026
- From Events to Reasoning: Hierarchical Rule Composition over Explicit States19 October 2026
- ECHOES: Seeing Beyond the Current Image via Recursive History Compression and Privileged On-Policy Distillation19 October 2026
- Sensitivity Analysis of Decision Rules in an Agent-Based Agro-Ecological Model19 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.