arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational15 October 2026
Big-Big-SycoBench: A Benchmark to Detect Sycophancy Through Model Responses to Valid vs. Invalid Arguments
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2610.15634v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sycophancy in large language models risks amplifying unsupported claims or beliefs across the knowledge ecosystem as these systems increasingly contribute to research synthesis, evaluation, and decision-making. A reliable model should revise its judgement when a user identifies a genuine flaw, but should resist pushback based on fallacies, emotion, or irrelevant appeals to authority. While sycophancy is usually measured on questions with a verifiable answer, the evaluative tasks in which it is most difficult to detect have no such ground truth. W
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- Artificiality's First Exam: An LLM-Referenced C-test for Supraintelligence15 October 2026
- The Silent Failures in Agentic Data Science15 October 2026
- ClawLoop: Self-Improving Agents via Harness-Native Training Loop15 October 2026
- Correction Training for Diffusion Models15 October 2026
- Long-Horizon-Terminal-Bench 2.0: Automating Diverse Task Construction and Measuring Sustained Agent Progress15 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.