FirsthandTech
arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational15 October 2026

Big-Big-SycoBench: A Benchmark to Detect Sycophancy Through Model Responses to Valid vs. Invalid Arguments

This is an official announcement record

Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.

arXiv:2610.15634v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sycophancy in large language models risks amplifying unsupported claims or beliefs across the knowledge ecosystem as these systems increasingly contribute to research synthesis, evaluation, and decision-making. A reliable model should revise its judgement when a user identifies a genuine flaw, but should resist pushback based on fallacies, emotion, or irrelevant appeals to authority. While sycophancy is usually measured on questions with a verifiable answer, the evaluative tasks in which it is most difficult to detect have no such ground truth. W
— arXiv — cs.AI preprints

More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints

This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.