arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational21 October 2026
Does Multi-Agent Collaboration Pay When Agents Serve Users? Testing Agent Scaling in Dual-Control Settings
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2610.27655v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent systems (MAS) built from language models are deployed on the premise that collaboration beats a single-agent system (SAS), yet when it pays is unclear. The most systematic study to date gives a capability-saturation rule: coordination helps while the SAS is weak and hurts once it is strong, with the crossing near 45% single-agent accuracy. That rule was derived on autonomous benchmarks, where no user takes part. We test it where agents now work: in conversation with a user under a written policy, on $\tau^2$-bench, the dual-control be
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- Navalia: Advancing Cowork Agents through Verifiable Task Synthesis and Long-Horizon Post-Training21 October 2026
- Large language model and reinforcement learning based autonomous construction and progress updates21 October 2026
- Pareto-Optimal RTL Code Generation via Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning with Large Language Models21 October 2026
- MedPAO-Assist: Edge-Deployable, Modality-Aware Agentic AI for Radiology Report Structuring21 October 2026
- DataPraxis: Scaling Analytics Tasks via Verified Workspace Evolution21 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.