arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational9 October 2026
Epistemic Disturbance in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution: State-Preserving Actions, Four-Valued Assessments, and the Distinction between Capability and Intention
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2610.11690v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In the graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR), a decision maker (DM) either moves the conflict to another state or does nothing. The basic definitions leave inaction implicit, so every action that leaves the state unchanged is treated as doing nothing. Yet announcements, exercises, leaks and selective disclosures are neither moves nor inaction: they leave the state unchanged but change what other DMs believe about which moves are available and which moves others would want to make. We introduce such state-preserving actions by augmenting st
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- An Explainable Header-Centric Framework for Large-Scale Semantic Table Interpretation and Data Quality Assessment9 October 2026
- Synthesis Through Simulation: Generating Coherent Enterprise Data via Scalable Agent-System Interaction9 October 2026
- Agent-Controlled Forgetting for Tool-Using Agents: Reversible Context Curation in Practice9 October 2026
- Verification and Self-Improvement in Agentic AI: Foundations and Limits9 October 2026
- The Harness as the Only Mutable Surface: Compliance-Bounded Self-Evolution of LLM Agents in Credit Pipelines, with a Measured Admission Gate9 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.