arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational5 October 2026
Evaluation format, not model capability, drives measured triage failure in the assessment of consumer health AI
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2603.11413v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: A recent Nature Medicine study reported that ChatGPT Health under-triages 51.6% of emergencies and concluded that consumer-facing AI triage poses safety risks. Its protocol, however, was an exam-style scaffold (forced A/B/C/D output, knowledge suppression, no clarifying questions) unlike how consumers use health chatbots. We ask whether the headline error rate is a property of the models or of the measurement. In a first, mechanistic study, five frontier LLMs on a 17-scenario bank scored 6.4 points higher under naturalistic patient-styl
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- MintFlow: Minimal Trajectory Intervention for Constrained Flow Matching5 October 2026
- Fast Models, Slow Evidence: A Paired and Self-Audited Evaluation of System-1 Decision Models for LLM Agent Harnesses5 October 2026
- The AI Risk Observatory: What Can We Learn from AI Disclosures in Annual Reports About Societal Resilience?5 October 2026
- Keep It CALM: Analyzing the Limits of Global Unsafety in Text-to-Image Generation5 October 2026
- Choosing Before Acting: Comparative Value Estimation for Long-Horizon Tool-Use Agents5 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.