arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational2 October 2026
Groundability, Not Scale Alone: When Weak Reviewers Can Audit Strong Coding Agents
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2610.01023v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Coding agents can return plausible patches that omit required behavior. These failures are hard to review because long traces and confident summaries often hide what was missed. We ask when a nominally weaker reviewer can reliably decide whether a patch solves its issue. We study 411 execution-labeled traces from three agents and 101 controlled cases. On 154 GPT-5.4 traces, structured but unchecked evidence raises both defect catch and over-rejection. We then provide official execution evidence as an upper-bound diagnostic. After choosing and f
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- Heavy-Tailed Memory Traces in Long-Horizon Language Agents2 October 2026
- When Do Causal World Models Help Modular LLM Agents2 October 2026
- From Proposal to Verified Effect: Praxa, an Evidence-Bound Harness for Governed AI Agent Execution2 October 2026
- What Do Rationales Communicate? A Message-Intervention Study in Role-Specialized QA2 October 2026
- Measuring the Microtask Eligibility Gap: When Is an Off-the-Shelf SLM Enough for an Agent Harness?2 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.