arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational9 October 2026
Has LLM Screening Performance Stalled in Software Engineering Systematic Reviews?
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2610.10633v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Screening in systematic reviews (SRs) is manual and time-consuming. Prior work has explored large language models (LLMs) for automating this step, but LLMs are evolving rapidly, so earlier performance claims may no longer accurately reflect their screening performance. We used an existing software engineering SR screening benchmark (SESR-Eval) as our data. We also power-sampled a new, smaller dataset (SESR-Eval-Mini) that allows evaluation at lower costs. Using this data, we evaluated eight new LLMs for screening performance. Additionally, we t
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- An Explainable Header-Centric Framework for Large-Scale Semantic Table Interpretation and Data Quality Assessment9 October 2026
- Synthesis Through Simulation: Generating Coherent Enterprise Data via Scalable Agent-System Interaction9 October 2026
- Agent-Controlled Forgetting for Tool-Using Agents: Reversible Context Curation in Practice9 October 2026
- Verification and Self-Improvement in Agentic AI: Foundations and Limits9 October 2026
- The Harness as the Only Mutable Surface: Compliance-Bounded Self-Evolution of LLM Agents in Credit Pipelines, with a Measured Admission Gate9 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.