arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational2 October 2026
High Volatility and Action Bias Distinguish LLMs from Humans in Group Coordination
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2604.02578v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Humans exhibit remarkable abilities to coordinate in groups. As large language models (LLMs) become more capable, it remains an open question whether they can demonstrate comparable adaptive coordination and whether they use the same strategies as humans. To better understand this, we compare LLM and human performance on a common-interest game with imperfect monitoring: Group Binary Search. In this $n$-player game, participants need to coordinate their actions to achieve a common objective. Players independently submit numerical values
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- Heavy-Tailed Memory Traces in Long-Horizon Language Agents2 October 2026
- When Do Causal World Models Help Modular LLM Agents2 October 2026
- From Proposal to Verified Effect: Praxa, an Evidence-Bound Harness for Governed AI Agent Execution2 October 2026
- What Do Rationales Communicate? A Message-Intervention Study in Role-Specialized QA2 October 2026
- Measuring the Microtask Eligibility Gap: When Is an Off-the-Shelf SLM Enough for an Agent Harness?2 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.