arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational21 October 2026
Is Sycophancy a Form of In-Context Updating?
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2610.28325v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Factual sycophancy, a language model's deference to a user's false beliefs, is usually understood as a bid for the user's approval at the expense of truthfulness. We argue that this framing over-emphasizes the user and propose viewing sycophancy as a failure within the broader and generally useful process of in-context updating, by which models revise their answers based on information supplied during an interaction. We support this view with behavioral and mechanistic evidence. First, models' responses to user claims sit within a broader pattern
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- Navalia: Advancing Cowork Agents through Verifiable Task Synthesis and Long-Horizon Post-Training21 October 2026
- Large language model and reinforcement learning based autonomous construction and progress updates21 October 2026
- Pareto-Optimal RTL Code Generation via Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning with Large Language Models21 October 2026
- MedPAO-Assist: Edge-Deployable, Modality-Aware Agentic AI for Radiology Report Structuring21 October 2026
- DataPraxis: Scaling Analytics Tasks via Verified Workspace Evolution21 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.