arXiv: cs.AI preprintsInternational6 November 2026
JudgmentBench: Comparing Rubric and Preference Evaluation for Quality Assessment
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv: cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2605.25240v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Two methodologies dominate current practices of benchmarking: rubric-based scoring evaluates items against predefined criteria, whereas comparative judgment elicits pairwise preferences between outputs. Although both methodologies are widely used, the choice between them is rarely justified. We release JudgmentBench, a benchmark of 30 real-world legal tasks, paired with 1,539 rubric scores and 1,530 pairwise preference judgments collected from practicing attorneys--including at major U.S. law firms--with substantial experience. The anno
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv: cs.AI preprints
- Formalizing inverse problems in the age of AI: possibilities, pitfalls, and an invitation6 November 2026
- KDASO: Knowledge-Data Dual-Driven Automated Skill Optimization for Liability Adjudication Tasks6 November 2026
- BlockLock: Reproducible LLM Inference with Fixed Batch Geometry6 November 2026
- Resource-Efficient Reinforcement Learning Post-Training through Elastic Expert Parallelism6 November 2026
- The Two-Ledger Model: Transaction-Grain Cost Accounting for Multi-Agent AI Systems Across Clouds, Models, and Systems of Record6 November 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.