arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational21 October 2026
Not Self-Decidable: LLMs Cannot Draw the Boundary of What an Agent Verifier Can Check
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2610.04699v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A verifier for an agent faces rules of two kinds: the ones a fixed check can settle and the ones that require a judge. A team that derives its own checks fixes that split up front. Where the requirements come from outside, as in finance, healthcare and law, the agent enforces rules it did not write, so the split falls to runtime, recurring for every predicate of every rule on every action at a rate no reviewer can audit. Every escalation scheme assumes a model can make that decision itself, that it is self-decidable. Across six corpora, inclu
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- Navalia: Advancing Cowork Agents through Verifiable Task Synthesis and Long-Horizon Post-Training21 October 2026
- Large language model and reinforcement learning based autonomous construction and progress updates21 October 2026
- Pareto-Optimal RTL Code Generation via Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning with Large Language Models21 October 2026
- MedPAO-Assist: Edge-Deployable, Modality-Aware Agentic AI for Radiology Report Structuring21 October 2026
- DataPraxis: Scaling Analytics Tasks via Verified Workspace Evolution21 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.