arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational5 October 2026
Not Until the Evidence Says So: Teaching LLM Investigators When to Close a Case
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2610.03190v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Accident, defect and outage investigations end with a decision that ordinary question answering never faces: whether the evidence gathered so far is enough to close the case. We study this decision for LLM investigators, which request evidence from a case file, revise their hypotheses, and either close the case with a conclusion grounded in what they read or leave it open and name what is missing. This judgment does not come with capability: an untrained 9B model overstates its evidence in 97% of its answers, and a frontier model that identifie
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- MintFlow: Minimal Trajectory Intervention for Constrained Flow Matching5 October 2026
- Fast Models, Slow Evidence: A Paired and Self-Audited Evaluation of System-1 Decision Models for LLM Agent Harnesses5 October 2026
- The AI Risk Observatory: What Can We Learn from AI Disclosures in Annual Reports About Societal Resilience?5 October 2026
- Keep It CALM: Analyzing the Limits of Global Unsafety in Text-to-Image Generation5 October 2026
- Choosing Before Acting: Comparative Value Estimation for Long-Horizon Tool-Use Agents5 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.