arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational5 October 2026
Right Order, Wrong Scale: Auditing LLM Judges for Occupational AI Measurement
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2610.02492v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM judges are increasingly used to assess whether AI outputs meet workplace requirements, but agreement on response rankings does not establish agreement on acceptance rates or occupational aggregates. We introduce O*NET-BENCH, an audit suite derived from an existing survey of 45,796 worker ratings, and evaluate 33 pre-existing judge configurations across six model families on 4,501 test ratings. Twenty-five configurations achieve tie-aware pair accuracy of at least 0.60, although a train-fitted response-only TF-IDF baseline nearly matches the s
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- MintFlow: Minimal Trajectory Intervention for Constrained Flow Matching5 October 2026
- Fast Models, Slow Evidence: A Paired and Self-Audited Evaluation of System-1 Decision Models for LLM Agent Harnesses5 October 2026
- The AI Risk Observatory: What Can We Learn from AI Disclosures in Annual Reports About Societal Resilience?5 October 2026
- Keep It CALM: Analyzing the Limits of Global Unsafety in Text-to-Image Generation5 October 2026
- Choosing Before Acting: Comparative Value Estimation for Long-Horizon Tool-Use Agents5 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.