arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational15 October 2026
Safety for Whom? Benchmarking Understanding Beyond Refusal in Egocentric Multimodal Assistants
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2610.17728v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Egocentric multimodal assistants see through the user's eyes and guide what the user does next, so their outputs directly shape physical actions, including those that affect bystanders. Yet existing safety evaluations do not distinguish whom a response would harm, and score only whether a model refuses. Pooling all harms into one refusal rate hides two failures: a model may protect one target but not another, and it may refuse without understanding the risk, or understand it and comply anyway. We present STOU, a benchmark of 2,902 egocentric vide
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- Artificiality's First Exam: An LLM-Referenced C-test for Supraintelligence15 October 2026
- The Silent Failures in Agentic Data Science15 October 2026
- ClawLoop: Self-Improving Agents via Harness-Native Training Loop15 October 2026
- Correction Training for Diffusion Models15 October 2026
- Long-Horizon-Terminal-Bench 2.0: Automating Diverse Task Construction and Measuring Sustained Agent Progress15 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.