FirsthandTech
arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational9 October 2026

TestJack: Should you trust the results in coding benchmarks? Agentic Coding Benchmarks Auditing via Evaluator Evolution

This is an official announcement record

Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.

arXiv:2610.10619v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are rapidly reshaping software engineering, accompanied by an explosion of new code benchmarks. Yet nearly all existing benchmarks still rely on the same decades-old criterion: a solution is correct if it passes a fixed set of unit tests. Such tests are often insufficient: they check only part of what the task requires, so agents can reward hack them or silently miss required behavior while still passing every test. As a result, higher benchmark scores may partly reflect better adaptation to the evaluator rathe
— arXiv — cs.AI preprints

More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints

This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.