arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational15 October 2026
The Format is the Filter: Scoring Format Fixes What an LLM Judge Can Express
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2610.17158v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When an LLM judge filters instruction-tuning data, its scoring format (binary verdict, 1--5 rating, 0--100 score, or comparison) is rarely justified or ablated. Holding the candidate pool, judge prompt, decoding and selection budget fixed, we score 15,406 UltraFeedback candidates under five formats with three judges, curate, fine-tune 66 models, and evaluate them with four judges. A 0--100 scale is worth only 7--12 equally used levels, two to three times a 1--5 scale rather than twenty, and a binary verdict leaves the top score tied in 77--78\% o
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- Artificiality's First Exam: An LLM-Referenced C-test for Supraintelligence15 October 2026
- The Silent Failures in Agentic Data Science15 October 2026
- ClawLoop: Self-Improving Agents via Harness-Native Training Loop15 October 2026
- Correction Training for Diffusion Models15 October 2026
- Long-Horizon-Terminal-Bench 2.0: Automating Diverse Task Construction and Measuring Sustained Agent Progress15 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.