arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational2 October 2026
What Does a Sharing Question Add? Auditing LLM Survey Scores for Misinformation
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2604.06820v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Evaluating misinformation requires distinguishing whether readers believe content from whether they would share it. Asking large language models (LLMs) both questions yields two scores, but does the sharing answer contribute information beyond the credibility answer? We audit eight model versions on 290 synthetic misinformation articles, using 1,256 paired survey responses with 317 participant identifiers as an external validity criterion. An initial reversal motivates the audit: every model's raw sharing score predicts mean human sharing les
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- Heavy-Tailed Memory Traces in Long-Horizon Language Agents2 October 2026
- When Do Causal World Models Help Modular LLM Agents2 October 2026
- From Proposal to Verified Effect: Praxa, an Evidence-Bound Harness for Governed AI Agent Execution2 October 2026
- What Do Rationales Communicate? A Message-Intervention Study in Role-Specialized QA2 October 2026
- Measuring the Microtask Eligibility Gap: When Is an Off-the-Shelf SLM Enough for an Agent Harness?2 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.