arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational19 October 2026
When Can You Trust an Agent's Own Verifier? Stress-Testing Counterfactual Rationale Verification Under Search Pressure and Oracle Access
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2610.22779v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated agent design increasingly trusts a single score to decide whether a change is an improvement -- but a score optimized aggressively enough ceases to measure what it was meant to. When an agent also explains its design, that explanation is a second signal we can check without human labels: negate each stated claim, re-run, and observe whether performance drops. We ask whether such a verifier stays reliable once an agent optimizes against it. Our contribution is not a new verifier but a way to stress-test one: a pressure ratio $\rho$ measu
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- Structured Authority Injection: Persistent Human Control for LLM Agents via Typed MCP Overrides19 October 2026
- Rethinking User Encoders: Routing Diffusion States for Scenario-Adaptive User Representation19 October 2026
- From Events to Reasoning: Hierarchical Rule Composition over Explicit States19 October 2026
- ECHOES: Seeing Beyond the Current Image via Recursive History Compression and Privileged On-Policy Distillation19 October 2026
- Sensitivity Analysis of Decision Rules in an Agent-Based Agro-Ecological Model19 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.