arXiv: cs.AI preprintsInternational11 November 2026
Comparative Analysis of Agent Evaluation Frameworks: Stability, Detection, and Discovery in Enterprise Analytics Agents
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv: cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2611.14493v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deploying LLM-based analytics agents in enterprise settings requires evaluation frameworks that can reliably detect failures across complex, multi-tool workflows. We present a three-phase comparative study of three evaluation frameworks, each representing a distinct evaluation paradigm (trace-based LLM judging, text-only LLM judging with red-teaming, and deterministic heuristics), applied to two analytics agents in a controlled research setting using frozen execution traces. Phase 1 quantifies evaluation harness stability through repeated measure
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv: cs.AI preprints
- Auditable Human-Agent Teams for Autonomous X-ray Experimentation11 November 2026
- EarthRecord: From Pixels to Land Change with Multimodal Agents over Four Decades of Satellite Imagery11 November 2026
- Train on prefill, monitor at decode: Using sparse autoencoders for topic monitoring11 November 2026
- LandslideFM: A Foundation Model Towards Unified Landslide Perception and Understanding11 November 2026
- Tracing Psychometric Inference in Large Language Models11 November 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.