arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational16 October 2026
Retrieved but Not Read: Understanding Why Search-Augmented LLMs Fail to Use Available Evidence
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2610.21731v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Web search allows LLMs to access up-to-date information, but it remains unclear why they sometimes produce outdated answers even when relevant evidence is available. To study this problem, we construct temporal facts whose values changed after the models' training cutoffs. We evaluate one proprietary model under deployed web search and six open-weight model configurations under controlled retrieval. We find that models often answer from search snippets without opening the source pages, which is associated with higher rates of outdated answers a
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- The World Won't Wait: Evaluating and Teaching Agents Under a Live Clock16 October 2026
- Evaluating Model Capabilities After Benchmark Saturation16 October 2026
- Value-Informed Schedule Trimming for Accelerated Sequential Monte Carlo Guidance in Discrete Diffusion16 October 2026
- AlphaDiana: A Measurement System for Agents in Verifiable Reasoning Tasks16 October 2026
- When Correctness Feedback Erases Evidence: Phase-Separated Completeness Auditing in Verus16 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.