arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational16 October 2026
When Correctness Feedback Erases Evidence: Phase-Separated Completeness Auditing in Verus
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2610.20676v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Correctness feedback suppresses the very evidence that specification-completeness auditing is designed to uncover: programs that satisfy a written contract but violate intended behavior. We demonstrate this objective reversal on 12 Verus/Rust tasks across four model families under matched call budgets. Independent no-feedback discovery more than doubles certified-witness yield relative to IntentShield's corrective-feedback loop (59.0% versus 27.1%). A format-matched iterative control places the larger share of this gap in feedback content, not in
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- The World Won't Wait: Evaluating and Teaching Agents Under a Live Clock16 October 2026
- Evaluating Model Capabilities After Benchmark Saturation16 October 2026
- Value-Informed Schedule Trimming for Accelerated Sequential Monte Carlo Guidance in Discrete Diffusion16 October 2026
- AlphaDiana: A Measurement System for Agents in Verifiable Reasoning Tasks16 October 2026
- Counterfactual Neighborhood Risk Fields: Evidence-Grounded Selective Safety for Vision-Language Models16 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.