arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational7 October 2026
Seeing Isn't Knowing: Do VLMs Know When Not to Answer Spatial Questions (and Why)?
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2605.30557v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Spatial reasoning benchmarks typically evaluate whether vision-language models can derive the correct answer from a visual observation. Yet in real 3D environments, the observation itself may be unreliable: occlusion can remove task-relevant evidence, while perspective can make visible geometry misleading. Reliable spatial reasoning therefore requires more than answering a question correctly. A model must also assess whether its current observation provides sufficient and trustworthy evidence for that answer. We introduce SPATIALUNCERTA
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- GAMEGO: Training Game-Dev Agents with Synthetic Trajectories Anchored in Real-World Assets7 October 2026
- Text2Dashboard: A Governed Agent Architecture for Natural-Language Dashboard Generation over Enterprise DataBrain7 October 2026
- FluidPD: In-Place Elasticity for SLO-Aware Prefill-Decode Disaggregated LLM Serving7 October 2026
- Anchor Divergence for Semantic Geometry in Contrastive Learning7 October 2026
- RadOnc-Agent: An LLM-Orchestrated Framework for AI Workflows Across the Radiotherapy Care Pathway7 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.