arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational7 October 2026
Verdicts Without Annotated Evidence: Rejection Sampling or Label-Only Post-Training for Evidence Recovery?
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2610.06962v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In many review workflows the verdict is the only thing retained. The passages behind it are not marked, because that annotation costs far more than recording the decision. We measure how much of that evidence a small language model can recover when it is post-trained on the verdicts alone, with no human evidence labels at any stage. On ContractNLI the human evidence spans are held out until evaluation. Matching the recorded verdict and agreeing with those spans are not the same thing: across six systems the two scores are only weakly related an
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- GAMEGO: Training Game-Dev Agents with Synthetic Trajectories Anchored in Real-World Assets7 October 2026
- Text2Dashboard: A Governed Agent Architecture for Natural-Language Dashboard Generation over Enterprise DataBrain7 October 2026
- FluidPD: In-Place Elasticity for SLO-Aware Prefill-Decode Disaggregated LLM Serving7 October 2026
- Anchor Divergence for Semantic Geometry in Contrastive Learning7 October 2026
- RadOnc-Agent: An LLM-Orchestrated Framework for AI Workflows Across the Radiotherapy Care Pathway7 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.