arXiv: cs.AI preprintsInternational11 November 2026
Veterans' Mental Health Crisis Severity Annotation: Do LLMs Agree More Than Human Experts?
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv: cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2611.10048v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) offer a scalable approach for annotating mental health and crisis-related social media content, but their reliability in safety-critical tasks remains unclear. This study evaluates LLM-based crisis-severity annotation of veteran-related social media posts against annotations from eight Veteran Subject Matter Experts (SMEs). Using 149 tweets and five severity categories, we evaluate 15 open-source and 10 proprietary LLMs across eight prompt variants, examining annotation performance, inter-model agreement, prompt s
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv: cs.AI preprints
- Auditable Human-Agent Teams for Autonomous X-ray Experimentation11 November 2026
- EarthRecord: From Pixels to Land Change with Multimodal Agents over Four Decades of Satellite Imagery11 November 2026
- Train on prefill, monitor at decode: Using sparse autoencoders for topic monitoring11 November 2026
- LandslideFM: A Foundation Model Towards Unified Landslide Perception and Understanding11 November 2026
- Tracing Psychometric Inference in Large Language Models11 November 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.