arXiv — cs.AI preprintsInternational16 October 2026
When Do LLMs Apply the Wrong Law? Diagnosing LLM Failures in Temporal Legal Reasoning
This is an official announcement record
Firsthand records what arXiv — cs.AI preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.
arXiv:2608.14610v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Legal reasoning requires identifying which version of a statute applies to a case, typically based on when the legally relevant events occurred rather than when the case is adjudicated. Yet whether large language models (LLMs) can reliably perform such temporal legal reasoning remains largely unexplored. We formalize this task as Temporal Applicable-Law Determination (TALD), and construct a TALD-Bench, a benchmark of 51,956 Chinese civil judgments spanning the enactment of the Civil Code. Evaluating nine advanced LLMs, we identify three key f
Read the official announcement
Opens arxiv.org
More from arXiv — cs.AI preprints
- The World Won't Wait: Evaluating and Teaching Agents Under a Live Clock16 October 2026
- Evaluating Model Capabilities After Benchmark Saturation16 October 2026
- Value-Informed Schedule Trimming for Accelerated Sequential Monte Carlo Guidance in Discrete Diffusion16 October 2026
- AlphaDiana: A Measurement System for Agents in Verifiable Reasoning Tasks16 October 2026
- When Correctness Feedback Erases Evidence: Phase-Separated Completeness Auditing in Verus16 October 2026
This content is for informational purposes only and is not professional advice. Specifications, prices, plan tiers, and features change frequently and may differ from what is shown here; verify current details on the manufacturer's or company's official page before purchasing. Ratings are based on analysis of published documentation, not independent lab testing.